South Korea's militaristic culture is fuelled by a history of conflict and maintained by a tradition of jingoistic, state-sponsored celebrations. Mandatory military service for men has become a focal point for growing tensions around gender equality. Its influence permeates society, shaping definitions of citizenship and creating social hierarchies. This structure excludes and represses all citizens - from conscripted men to excluded women, men, and gender minorities. Women and other gender groups are increasingly questioning this militaristic culture.
By Kim Ellim, Feminist Institute for Peace Studies
On October 1, 2024, approximately 5,000 troops and over 340 units of 83 different types of military equipment gathered at Gwanghwamun Square in central Seoul. Even the ‘Hyunmoo-5,’ known as a “monster missile,” the ‘L-SAM,’ a long-range surface-to-air missile, and the B-1B ‘Lancer,’ a supersonic strategic heavy bomber used by the United States Air Force, were publicly displayed. The South Korean government stated that this Armed Forces Day featured a commemorative event and a parade through the city to “demonstrate overwhelming defense capabilities that achieve peace through strength both domestically and internationally.” Despite the criticism that the parade—for the second consecutive year and the first time in 40 years since the military governments—represented excessive budget spending and heightened tensions on the Korean Peninsula, the government designated the day as a public holiday, elevating Armed Forces Day to an “important” state affair. The parade of soldiers and weaponry filling the square was a reminder of the shadow of militarism cast over South Korean society.
As numerous feminists have pointed out, militarism and gender inequality are both the root causes and catalysts for each other. In South Korean society, the military sits particularly at the centre of this cycle. Every Korean is bound by the duty of national defense under South Korea’s Constitution, yet the Military Service Act applies only to male citizens. For many young Korean men, the military is a place they must go but never wish to. At the same time, evading military service is considered an unforgivable transgression (always a hot topic across politics, society, and entertainment), and being unable to serve is often viewed as being “incomplete” or “defective.” Government evaluations for service eligibility easily categorize young men into “normal” (eligible for active duty) and “abnormal” (ineligible for active duty) groups. Even those who join the military as “normal” may still face stigma if they struggle in the face of violence, injustices, or ostracization. The violent nature of the military is not limited to physical violence alone.
In previous eras, when gender discrimination was even more pronounced, men regarded military service as an unquestioned duty of citizenship. The state, armed with the logic of national security and appeals to patriotism, used young men as military resources at an unreasonably low cost. Although some men were dissatisfied with the conscription system, their frustration was rarely directed at women. The point when conflicts between gender issues and military service truly began dates back to 1999, when a major controversy erupted over the abolition of the military service bonus point system. Men have now reached a point where they can no longer tolerate the reality that only men are required to serve. A sense of “unfairness” and feelings of resentment dominate their frustrations. Many have started to view young women who do not serve (or bear children) as free riders on national security, and women who advocate for equal citizenship while not equally serving in the military have become targets of criticism. Since then, several constitutional petitions have been filed demanding female conscription, yet the Military Service Act, which mandates conscription for men only, remains unchanged. These decisions were not made by feminist women, but men’s anger quickly turned toward women.
Military service bonus point system is a system that granted an additional 3-5% in public official recruitment exams to discharged veterans who completed mandatory military service was in place from 1961 to 1999. The Constitutional Court ruled it unconstitutional, stating that it infringed on the equal rights of women and people with disabilities, and their right to hold public office, leading to the system’s abolition.
Meanwhile, along with institutional efforts to address gender discrimination, social changes such as higher education levels, increased labour participation, and greater political representation for women have unfolded over a long period. The reinvigoration of feminism in online public forums in 2015 especially empowered young women’s political engagement. The #MeToo movement, protests following the Gangnam Station murder, the “Uncomfortable Courage” protest against biased investigations of illegal filming, and the “Black Protest” demanding decriminalization of abortion became platforms uniting the voices of young women. In response to the growing influence and political participation of progressive women, some conservative political circles mobilized yidaenam (men in their 20s), with policies that divide and provoke gender confrontation openly promoted in the public sphere. Now, “female conscription” has become a lip-service tool for populist politicians seeking votes from young male constituents, surfacing and disappearing every election season. Instead of being discussed in connection with long-term strategies to address the declining birth rate, changing military needs, or various paths to peace on the Korean Peninsula, the issue of conscription instead serves as fuel for gender conflict, intensifying confrontation and competition between genders.
However, if alleged free-riding by women who do not serve in the military is really an issue, would women who do serve be free from this controversy? That is not the reality. More than 70 years have passed since the establishment of female soldiers in the South Korean military, and as of June 2024, female officers and non-commissioned officers numbered approximately 19,200 (10.8% of serving personnel). Despite the gradual expansion of female soldiers, they remain relatively few and endure scrutiny and constant comparison to their male counterparts throughout their military careers. Female soldiers are subjected to the prejudice that they fall short of their male peers due to physical differences, yet paradoxically face a strict expectation to demonstrate skills surpassing those of men. Furthermore, when female soldiers encounter situations arising from the closed and violent nature of the military, the issue is frequently dismissed as something that occurred simply because women are in the military, with the implication that they do not belong there. In addition, within the male-dominant military culture, female soldiers are more vulnerable to sexual discrimination and violence. According to a 2022 report by the National Human Rights Commission of Korea, experiences of sexual harassment in the military were four times higher for women (32.1%) than for men (8%), while experiences of bullying were nearly twice as high for women (42.9%) compared to men (22.3%).
Militaristic concepts and language—such as military, defense, and security—rely on a dichotomy of “protecting men” and “protected women.” The division of gender roles inevitably creates a hierarchy, leaving women unable to stand as equal citizens. In South Korea, the strongest basis for this mechanism is whether or not one has completed military service. Those who have not served are seen as unqualified to speak up. In short, women are not considered partners in discussions on national security and social security. Even former President Park Geun-hye, a woman, and current President Yoon Suk-yeol, who received a medical exemption from service, are not free from accusations of “unfulfilled military duty.” The military thus becomes an excuse for men to resent women without much reflection.
This politics of exclusion and hatred ultimately brings adverse results for everyone. The mythologized image of the real soldier or brave male warrior serves neither cisgender women, transgender women, gay men, nor even heterosexual, putatively “normal” men. The army’s attempt to identify and penalize gay male soldiers under the Military Criminal Act, along with the tragic death of Staff SergeantByun Hui-su, who was forcibly discharged after her gender transition, compels us to question whom the South Korean military is truly meant to serve. The same holds true for countless ordinary men who struggled to adapt to military life and soldiers who endured violence and injustices within the military. Militarism pressures citizens to display blind patriotism and self-sacrifice, openly using methods that encourage hatred, hostility, and conflict to facilitate this process. The patriotic mindset of distinguishing “us” from “enemies” and defeating them can, with only a slight variation, be redirected to identify and demonize perceived enemies within. At this point, all Koreans are ultimately victims of this “politics of hostility.”
Kim Ellim is a research fellow at Feminist Institute for Peace Studies. She began to study journalism and North Korean studies, and became interested in media, society, gender, unification, and peace. While studying international relations to learn more about peace, she focused on the intersection of war and gender and studied the experiences of women participating in the Korean War.
The views in this article are not necessarily those of FES.
In the face of a growing climate crisis, the military industry is promoting "eco-friendly" weapons and technologies, but are these innovations truly…
“We, Korean women, survive no matter what it takes, because that's who we are."
Bringing together the work of our offices in the region, we provide you with the latest news on current debates, insightful research and innovative visual outputs on geopolitics, climate and energy, gender justice, trade unions and social-ecological transformation.
Since reports emerged that South Korean troops massacred civilians during the Vietnam War, there has been a fitful but determined effort by Vietnamese... More
Trade unions are drivers for transformative change. For sustainable change, gender justice is indispensable. Therefore, trade unions have to transform... More
South Korea's militaristic culture is fuelled by a history of conflict and maintained by a tradition of jingoistic, state-sponsored celebrations.... More
This site uses third-party website tracking technologies to provide and continually improve our services, and to display advertisements according to users' interests. I agree and may revoke or change my consent at any time with effect for the future.
These technologies are required to activate the core functionality of the website.
This is an self hosted web analytics platform.
Data Purposes
This list represents the purposes of the data collection and processing.
Technologies Used
Data Collected
This list represents all (personal) data that is collected by or through the use of this service.
Legal Basis
In the following the required legal basis for the processing of data is listed.
Retention Period
The retention period is the time span the collected data is saved for the processing purposes. The data needs to be deleted as soon as it is no longer needed for the stated processing purposes.
The data will be deleted as soon as they are no longer needed for the processing purposes.
These technologies enable us to analyse the use of the website in order to measure and improve performance.
This is a video player service.
Processing Company
Google Ireland Limited
Google Building Gordon House, 4 Barrow St, Dublin, D04 E5W5, Ireland
Location of Processing
European Union
Data Recipients
Data Protection Officer of Processing Company
Below you can find the email address of the data protection officer of the processing company.
https://support.google.com/policies/contact/general_privacy_form
Transfer to Third Countries
This service may forward the collected data to a different country. Please note that this service might transfer the data to a country without the required data protection standards. If the data is transferred to the USA, there is a risk that your data can be processed by US authorities, for control and surveillance measures, possibly without legal remedies. Below you can find a list of countries to which the data is being transferred. For more information regarding safeguards please refer to the website provider’s privacy policy or contact the website provider directly.
Worldwide
Click here to read the privacy policy of the data processor
https://policies.google.com/privacy?hl=en
Click here to opt out from this processor across all domains
https://safety.google/privacy/privacy-controls/
Click here to read the cookie policy of the data processor
https://policies.google.com/technologies/cookies?hl=en
Storage Information
Below you can see the longest potential duration for storage on a device, as set when using the cookie method of storage and if there are any other methods used.
This service uses different means of storing information on a user’s device as listed below.
This cookie stores your preferences and other information, in particular preferred language, how many search results you wish to be shown on your page, and whether or not you wish to have Google’s SafeSearch filter turned on.
This cookie measures your bandwidth to determine whether you get the new player interface or the old.
This cookie increments the views counter on the YouTube video.
This is set on pages with embedded YouTube video.
This is a service for displaying video content.
Vimeo LLC
555 West 18th Street, New York, New York 10011, United States of America
United States of America
Privacy(at)vimeo.com
https://vimeo.com/privacy
https://vimeo.com/cookie_policy
This cookie is used in conjunction with a video player. If the visitor is interrupted while viewing video content, the cookie remembers where to start the video when the visitor reloads the video.
An indicator of if the visitor has ever logged in.
Registers a unique ID that is used by Vimeo.
Saves the user's preferences when playing embedded videos from Vimeo.
Set after a user's first upload.
This is an integrated map service.
Gordon House, 4 Barrow St, Dublin 4, Ireland
https://support.google.com/policies/troubleshooter/7575787?hl=en
United States of America,Singapore,Taiwan,Chile
http://www.google.com/intl/de/policies/privacy/