The age when algorithms control humans. How true is it?
The destructive controlling aspect of platform algorithms reveals the true nature of platform capitalism. Platform companies leverage and control algorithms for profit. The use of algorithms has expanded with the advancement of technology, allowing them to collect and process vast amounts of input data, including visual, audio, biometric, and characters, from cameras, sensors, and other devices. In particular, platform businesses are aware of the value of managing platform algorithm to generate profits.
“The age of destroyed boundaries” seems to be an appropriate description of platform capitalism. The existing economic systems or business models are gradually shifting towards a platform economy. Over the two decades since its founding, Amazon has emerged as a major global player, while Coupang has experienced rapid growth, employing 65,000 people directly within 10 years, following Samsung Electronics and Hyundai Motor in terms of direct employment. Additionally, delivery platforms such as Uber, Lyft, and Deliveroo have established themselves as a prominent industry.
News articles discussing Amazon Mechanical Turk's corporate innovation have become quite common. Online crowdsourcing mediation services such as Appen, Clickwalker, and Scale, descendants of Amazon, have emerged. In Korea, the online crowdsourcing company Crowdworks stands out as an example. Notably, even industry giants like Google and Facebook utilize online intermediaries.
Platforms break down complicated jobs into their smallest units and measure and evaluate every task, associating it with performance and rewards. Platform companies employ algorithm technologies to precisely measure, efficiently deploy, and automate the flow of various data such as labor, resources, and services. This hands computing governing capabilities to companies as well as countries. Nick Srnicek, the author of Platform Capitalism, called platform apps “the core device to mine data from labor activities.”
Platformization involves the process of datafication, where human behavior is captured and transformed into data to generate new values. Human behavior and interpersonal interactions - which are qualitatively varied and distinct - are translated into quantitative indicators such as activity, viral index, and platform stay time. In the labor market, work experience including characteristics and competency of individuals is replaced by quantifiable figures like suitability and rating. As a result, compensation and control for platform workers’ labor are also used for standardized indicators. Baemin and Kakao T, which have monopolistic share of their respective markets in South Korea, also manage these algorithms.
However, profit-making through algorithm control, also known as platform technology innovation, raises labor intensity and threatens workers' mental health. Platform companies do not disclose the data collected and its usage to workers, even while 28.4 percent of workers criticize platform businesses for unfair work allocation, and just 25.6 percent view the distribution work as fair.
The platforms, on the other hand, closely monitor and evaluate the workers when they select or carry out tasks. If workers fail to follow app instructions or receive poor ratings from customers, they are sometimes subject to penalties. For instance, workers may be fewer job assignments or assigned to tasks with reduced prices. In serious cases, their app accounts are suspended for a certain period. Only 21.3 percent of workers believe that worker evaluation by platform apps is objective, while 23 percent disagree.
The more sophisticated platform algorithms become, the more time workers are forced to work, leaving them with less time for relaxation. Long-term platform workers, in particular, complain of negative feelings like helplessness (61.8 percent), isolation (58.0 percent), feelings of being a machine (61.1 percent), a sense of low achievement (61.0 percent), and finding no meaning in their work (60.4 percent). 21 percent of platform workers reported that they felt alone while working over the past year. Additionally, it has been found that workers have lost the autonomy and professionalism that they once had before they got into platform work. In other words, they think that living labor is replaced with dead labor.
Algorithm management actually refers to a series of processes and activities that implement organizational control through the automation of instructions, evaluations, and disciplinary measures that were previously conducted by either humans or machines. However, as platform algorithms are applied to all aspects of daily life, they extend their realm across all facets of human and worker activities. By standardizing platform labor processes, platform capital reorganizes these algorithms to be applied in various places beyond factories and offices.
Platform labor, the so-called digital Taylorism, is a new form of labor in the 21st Century and appears everywhere. This new type of labor, in which the lines between formal and informal work are blurred, is not the end of jobs altogether but the introduction of a new aspect of low-grade employment. Disguised behind fancy terms like “users,” “performers,” and “players” instead of “workers,” there exists a trend of post-work society that makes it challenging to identify the true exploiter.
“App work,” created by individual capitals and companies in the platform capitalist economic system can be seen as a new stage of labor exploitation based on platform algorithms. In the future, it is vital to enhance corporate responsibility and obligations concerning platform algorithms. Particular attention should be given to abuse of management and control, privacy invasion, data rights, basic labor rights, and health risks.
In contrast to this need, Korea emphasizes the importance of a free market and tends to rely on self-regulation by businesses, as opposed to the discussions in the European Union. However, history has shown that the market has never guaranteed human dignity, ever since the Industrial Revolution. By nature, profit-seekers try to avoid rules and regulations. Given the insatiable greed of platform capital, it is urgent to provide workers with protection and rights via social regulations.
Jongjin Kim is a chair of the Korea Worker Institute·Union Center. Mr. Kim is working on various labor issues and agendas including service labor, platform labor, freelancers, working hours, emotional labor, and youth issues. He is also serving as a social rights expert member of the National Human Rights Council of Korea and a steering committee member of the Korean Journal of Labor Studies.
Bringing together the work of our offices in the region, we provide you with the latest news on current debates, insightful research and innovative visual outputs on geopolitics, climate and energy, gender justice, trade unions and social-ecological transformation.
Thought leaders from 20 countries explored how both larger and smaller powers navigate geopolitical contestations in three theatres: East Asia,... More
Who cleans our city? Do you spot them among the beautiful city landscape and lush green scenery? Do you know that the cleanliness of the city is their... More
Since reports emerged that South Korean troops massacred civilians during the Vietnam War, there has been a fitful but determined effort by Vietnamese... More
This site uses third-party website tracking technologies to provide and continually improve our services, and to display advertisements according to users' interests. I agree and may revoke or change my consent at any time with effect for the future.
These technologies are required to activate the core functionality of the website.
This is an self hosted web analytics platform.
Data Purposes
This list represents the purposes of the data collection and processing.
Technologies Used
Data Collected
This list represents all (personal) data that is collected by or through the use of this service.
Legal Basis
In the following the required legal basis for the processing of data is listed.
Retention Period
The retention period is the time span the collected data is saved for the processing purposes. The data needs to be deleted as soon as it is no longer needed for the stated processing purposes.
The data will be deleted as soon as they are no longer needed for the processing purposes.
These technologies enable us to analyse the use of the website in order to measure and improve performance.
This is a video player service.
Processing Company
Google Ireland Limited
Google Building Gordon House, 4 Barrow St, Dublin, D04 E5W5, Ireland
Location of Processing
European Union
Data Recipients
Data Protection Officer of Processing Company
Below you can find the email address of the data protection officer of the processing company.
https://support.google.com/policies/contact/general_privacy_form
Transfer to Third Countries
This service may forward the collected data to a different country. Please note that this service might transfer the data to a country without the required data protection standards. If the data is transferred to the USA, there is a risk that your data can be processed by US authorities, for control and surveillance measures, possibly without legal remedies. Below you can find a list of countries to which the data is being transferred. For more information regarding safeguards please refer to the website provider’s privacy policy or contact the website provider directly.
Worldwide
Click here to read the privacy policy of the data processor
https://policies.google.com/privacy?hl=en
Click here to opt out from this processor across all domains
https://safety.google/privacy/privacy-controls/
Click here to read the cookie policy of the data processor
https://policies.google.com/technologies/cookies?hl=en
Storage Information
Below you can see the longest potential duration for storage on a device, as set when using the cookie method of storage and if there are any other methods used.
This service uses different means of storing information on a user’s device as listed below.
This cookie stores your preferences and other information, in particular preferred language, how many search results you wish to be shown on your page, and whether or not you wish to have Google’s SafeSearch filter turned on.
This cookie measures your bandwidth to determine whether you get the new player interface or the old.
This cookie increments the views counter on the YouTube video.
This is set on pages with embedded YouTube video.
This is a service for displaying video content.
Vimeo LLC
555 West 18th Street, New York, New York 10011, United States of America
United States of America
Privacy(at)vimeo.com
https://vimeo.com/privacy
https://vimeo.com/cookie_policy
This cookie is used in conjunction with a video player. If the visitor is interrupted while viewing video content, the cookie remembers where to start the video when the visitor reloads the video.
An indicator of if the visitor has ever logged in.
Registers a unique ID that is used by Vimeo.
Saves the user's preferences when playing embedded videos from Vimeo.
Set after a user's first upload.
This is an integrated map service.
Gordon House, 4 Barrow St, Dublin 4, Ireland
https://support.google.com/policies/troubleshooter/7575787?hl=en
United States of America,Singapore,Taiwan,Chile
http://www.google.com/intl/de/policies/privacy/